Design Services in India
Design Registration and Protection in India
Industrial designs in India are governed by the Designs Act, 2000 and the Designs Rules, 2001, with substantive examination at the Designs Wing of the Patent Office, Kolkata. Protectable subject matter is limited under Section 2(d) to features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament, or composition of lines or colours applied to an article by an industrial process and judged solely by the eye in the finished article. A registered design gives a time-limited civil right: ten years under Section 11(1), extendable once by five years under Section 11(2), with piracy enforcement under Section 22 and no criminal sanction under the Act. Intepat works with Indian product companies, foreign rights holders filing into India, and foreign IP firms instructing Indian designs work across filing, foreign filing, cancellation defence, and enforcement.
Speak with our Designs TeamSenior Counsel Signoff
Section 2(d) Judgement
Statement of Novelty Discipline
International Filing Coordination
Confidentiality from First Contact
What Intepat’s design practice covers
Intepat’s designs practice covers the full Indian designs lifecycle: domestic filing and prosecution before the Designs Wing of the Patent Office, Kolkata; foreign filing strategy and India-side coordination outside the Hague System, since India is not a contracting party; cancellation petitions under Section 19 and validity defence in infringement actions; piracy enforcement under Section 22, including the election between the statutory contract-debt route under Section 22(2)(a) and a suit for damages with injunction under Section 22(2)(b); and border enforcement through Customs recordation under the IPR (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007.
Filing decisions are taken with commercial purpose in view, whether registration to support enforcement, foreign filing to cover export markets, or cancellation to clear a blocking registration. Prosecution, cancellation petitions, Customs recordation, e-commerce takedowns, and pre-litigation work are fully in scope. Specialist courtroom litigation, where required, is coordinated with litigation counsel of the client’s choice.
Core service groups
Select the service group closest to the matter at hand: Indian registration, international filing, or cancellation and enforcement.
Registration
Indian filing under the Designs Act, 2000 establishes the registered right. The application is examined for novelty, originality, prior publication, and whether the design is not significantly distinguishable from known designs or combinations of known designs; compliance with the Section 2(d) definition is assessed separately. Objections are responded to and, where required, heard before the Controller; registration is entered and the certificate issued under Section 9. Class selection under the Locarno Classification at filing, the statement of novelty, and representation-sheet preparation are the leverage points that determine prosecution path and downstream enforcement scope.
International Filing
India is not a contracting party to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs, so foreign protection runs country by country. Filings are made through direct national applications, regional systems where eligible such as the registered EU design under the EU Design Regulation as reformed from 1 May 2025, and Paris Convention priority within six months of the first Indian filing. Saudi Arabia became Hague-designatable from 7 April 2025 and can be reached through Hague where the applicant qualifies via a Hague-eligible entity.
Cancellation and Enforcement
A registered design may be cancelled by petition to the Controller under Section 19 on grounds of prior registration, prior publication, lack of novelty, non-registrability, or failure to satisfy Section 2(d); appeal lies to the High Court under Section 19(2). Piracy under Section 22 is actionable through civil suit before a court not below the District Court, transferred to the High Court under Section 22(4) where a Section 19 invalidity defence is raised. Enforcement is exclusively civil; no criminal sanction applies under the Designs Act, 2000.
How Intepat delivers design services
Engagement quality on designs work turns on counsel experience rather than a statutory agent class. The Designs Act, 2000 does not establish a registered designs agent equivalent to the Patent Agent under the Patents Act, 1970 or the Trademark Agent under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Indian counsel acts on the strength of designs prosecution and litigation experience, statutory drafting discipline, and Section 2(d) subject-matter judgement. Filings, examination responses, cancellation petitions and counter-statements, and enforcement notices are signed off by senior design counsel.
Cross-IP framing is built in. Many design assets operate at the boundary of other regimes: a packaging artwork is simultaneously an artistic work under the Copyright Act, 1957, and Section 15(2) of that Act ends copyright in any design industrially reproduced more than fifty times where registrable but unregistered; logos and product shapes may also function as trademarks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, with implications for cancellation under Section 19(1)(e). Filing strategy is set with these overlaps in view from intake.
Who this is for
The designs practice is designed for:
Indian product manufacturers and design-led brands registering shape, configuration, and surface ornament of articles placed on the market.
Consumer goods, fashion, jewellery, and industrial design companies building registered design portfolios across product lines.
Foreign rights holders filing into India and coordinating Indian-side prosecution through Indian counsel.
Indian applicants taking designs abroad and needing coordinated foreign filing within the Paris Convention priority window.
Companies facing piracy of a registered design in the Indian market or cancellation petitions before the Controller.
Foreign IP firms instructing Indian designs work on behalf of design-owner clients.
Why choose Intepat for designs
Senior counsel signoff on every designs engagement.
Design filings, examination responses, cancellation petitions and counter-statements, and enforcement notices are signed off by senior design counsel rather than handled at junior level. The Designs Act, 2000 does not establish a statutory agent class, so counsel experience and statutory discipline are the differentiator.
Section 2(d) subject-matter judgement at intake.
Section 2(d) excludes mechanical principles and pure function from registrability, and a registered design built on heavily functional configuration draws a cancellation challenge at first enforcement. Subject-matter risk is mapped at intake against Section 4 examination grounds and Section 19 cancellation grounds, with class selection and statement-of-novelty drafting calibrated accordingly.
Statement of novelty and representation discipline.
The statement of novelty defines the scope of right asserted, and the representation sheets fix what the eye is asked to compare in infringement. Both are prepared with downstream enforcement in mind, not just acceptance at the Designs Wing.
International filing without assuming Hague availability.
Foreign design filing from India is treated as a country-by-country programme paced against the six-month Paris Convention priority window. Hague-eligibility is assessed where a qualifying foreign group entity exists, but Hague is not offered as a default route for Indian applicants.
Cross-IP discipline on the design-copyright-trademark boundary.
Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957, the Section 19(1)(e) registered-design-as-trademark cancellation ground, and the functionality bar under Section 2(d) define the boundary with the other regimes. Strategy is set with these in view.
Confidentiality from first contact.
Confidentiality protocols apply from initial inquiry; conflict checks precede every new engagement.
Related IP services
Design assets often require coordinated trademark and copyright protection. Logos, packaging artwork, and applied artistic works operate at the boundary of the Designs Act, 2000, the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the Copyright Act, 1957, with Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 mediating the design-copyright boundary specifically. Choosing the right combination depends on commercial purpose and intended enforcement posture.
Design Practice FAQs
Who can act as designs counsel in India?
The Designs Act, 2000 does not establish a statutory agent class equivalent to the Patent Agent under the Patents Act, 1970 or the Trademark Agent under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Designs filing, prosecution before the Designs Wing of the Patent Office at Kolkata, cancellation petitions, and enforcement work can be handled by attorneys without a separate registered-agent qualification. Engagement quality turns on counsel experience with designs prosecution and litigation, Section 2(d) judgement, and statement-of-novelty drafting. Intepat's designs practice is led and signed off by senior design counsel.
Which design services does Intepat cover?
The practice covers Indian filing and prosecution under the Designs Act, 2000; foreign filing strategy and India-side coordination outside the Hague System; cancellation petitions under Section 19 and validity defence in infringement actions; piracy enforcement under Section 22; Customs recordation under the IPR (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007; e-commerce platform takedowns; and pre-litigation correspondence. Specialist courtroom litigation is coordinated with litigation counsel of the client's choice.
Is design registration mandatory in India?
No. There is no statutory obligation to register a design before placing the article on the market in India. However, the registered right is the foundation of enforcement: Section 22 piracy action is available only to the registered proprietor, and unregistered design protection in India is materially limited, particularly given that Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 ends copyright in any registrable design industrially reproduced more than fifty times. For any article placed on the market at commercial scale, registration is the practical baseline.
How long is the term of a registered design in India?
The term is ten years from the date of registration under Section 11(1), extendable by five years once under Section 11(2) on application before the original ten-year term expires. The maximum total term is fifteen years. The extension application must be filed within the statutory window; Intepat tracks renewal and extension deadlines for design registrations under its prosecution mandate.
How is design protection from India coordinated internationally?
India is not a contracting party to the Hague Agreement, so foreign protection is pursued through direct national filings, regional systems where eligible such as the registered EU design, and Paris Convention priority claims within six months of the first Indian filing. Where an Indian group includes a foreign entity that independently qualifies through nationality, domicile, habitual residence, or a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in a Hague contracting party, Hague filing may be assessed through that entity. Foreign filing programmes are paced against the six-month priority window.
Does Intepat handle design infringement litigation?
Cancellation petitions before the Controller under Section 19, validity defence in infringement actions, evidence preparation, Customs recordation under the IPR (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007, e-commerce platform takedowns, and pre-litigation strategy are within scope and handled directly. Civil suits for piracy under Section 22 before the District Courts and High Courts, including matters transferred under Section 22(4) on a Section 19 validity defence, are coordinated with specialist litigation counsel of the client's choice. Pre-litigation work, including evidence collection and notice drafting, is handled in-house.
Outline Your Design Requirements
Send your details and the Designs Team will respond within one business day.