Intepat Logo
Search Icon
AboutWhy Intepat
Services
Patent Services›
Trademark Services›
Design Services›
Copyright Services›
Cross-IP Services›
CareersBlog
IP Resources
Patent Fees Calculator
Patent Renewal Fees Calculator
PCT National Phase Calculator
Trademark Classification Tool
Contact Us
Menu Toggle
Intepat
Trademark

How is your User Date protecting your Trademark?

Have you ever wondered what was the importance of your trademark’s user date? User date is no less to others…
I
Intepat Interns
Jun 19, 2017
4 min read
Home/Blog/How is your User Date protecting your Trademark?

Have you ever wondered what was the importance of your trademark’s user date? User date is no less to others for protecting a trademark. In this article, I have dealt with the meaning and importance of user date in trademark along with some decided cases.

User date is nothing but the date from which the trademark is being used irrespective its registration. In a country like India, the ‘prior user’ has more importance than the registered mark. To claim such priority, user date is mandatory and shall be proved.

When user date is concerned, the very first question which comes to our mind is what amounts to use of trademark? In a catena of cases, the courts have interpreted the term ‘usage’ not only with the volume of sales but also with advertisements of such marks and the consumer awareness of the same.

In Uniply Industries Ltd. vs. Unicorn Plywood Pvt. Ltd. & Ors the court held that, “…Bona fide test of marketing, promotional gifts and experimental sales in small volume may be sufficient to establish a continuous prior use of the mark.”

Prior use gives an Exclusive right to the trademark

As I have said earlier, the prior user has an exclusive right over the mark compared to the registered user. Such a right can be claimed by submission of user date as a proof of such prior use. The law makes it clear that the prior user can enjoy priority in registration as well as prevent any third person from infringing or registering the same/similar mark.

Section 33 of The Trade Marks Act expressly restricts the registered proprietor in interfering the prior user’s rights.

The famous judgment in the case N.R.Dongre and Ors vs. Whirlpool Corporation and Anr. makes it clear that there is no statutory bar to a prior user of a trade mark for bringing an action against the registered user and it is no defense that the defendant’s trade mark is registered and the prior user’s is not so registered.

Prior use and Passing off

Passing off is the sole right which protects the unregistered marks, even against the registered marks. Section 27(2) of The Trade Marks Act says that a prior user of a trade mark can take an action for passing off against any subsequent user of a similar trade mark including a registered user.

In Century Traders vs. Roshan Lal Duggar & Co. the court held that “registration of a mark is irrelevant in an action of passing off and in order to succeed the proceedings one has to prove the prior use”.

However, the burden of proof lies on the plaintiff. He has to prove prior use of his mark. The satisfaction of this proof alone limits the use of same or similar trademark.

Prior use and Distinctiveness

The trademarks to be registered should not be descriptive. An Exception to this rule is the acquisition of secondary meaning. It is technically using the mark continuously for a longer period which eventually gains popularity and reputation.

In Godfrey Philips India Limited v. Girnar Food & Beverages (P) Limited and Info Edge (India) Private Limited and another v. Shailesh Gupta & Anr., the court observed that “a descriptive trademark is entitled to protection if it has assumed a secondary meaning by a long use in the market”.

In such a way, long use and the mark share an interesting relationship in making a mark distinctive.

Priority and user date

It is none other than the first user of the mark who gets priority in trademark proceedings. In case of any objections raised in the registration of a mark, first use of the mark shall be an effective ground. The first user of a mark is absolutely entitled to be protected under law. Unless the user date is mentioned, it becomes difficult to claim the ‘first use’.

In Consolidated Foods Corporation v. Brandon and Co., Private Ltd. it was observed that “priority in adoption and use of a trade mark is superior to priority in registration”.

Conclusion

It is the trademark which is considered as an asset of a brand and no one gives up on their trademark. What is the quintessential necessity to protect such right? I would say it as prior use of the mark. The doctrine of prior use is given the primary consideration in any trademark proceedings, and there is no way to prove the same without the user date. Despite everything, your user date is the moment your trademark is born, so celebrate it.

SHARE

Need Expert IP Advice?

Our specialists are here to help you protect your innovations globally.
Book Free Consultation
Response within 24 hours
Related Articles
Trademark Franchising in India: A Founder’s Guide
Jun 13, 2026
Trademark Licensing in India: Registered User, Rights and Process
Jun 12, 2026
Divisional Application for Multi-Class Trademarks in India
Jun 10, 2026
Trade Name vs Trademark in India: Company Name Is Not Brand Protection
Jun 9, 2026
IP Tools
Patent Fees CalculatorPatent Renewal Fees CalculatorTrademark Classification Tool

Need Expert IP Advice?

Our specialists are here to help you protect your innovations globally.
Book Free Consultation
Response within 24 hours
SHARE
Related Articles
Trademark Franchising in India: A Founder’s Guide
Jun 13, 2026
Trademark Licensing in India: Registered User, Rights and Process
Jun 12, 2026
Divisional Application for Multi-Class Trademarks in India
Jun 10, 2026
Trade Name vs Trademark in India: Company Name Is Not Brand Protection
Jun 9, 2026
I
About the Author
Intepat Interns
Intepat Interns contribute to research and content development under the supervision of the Intepat Team, comprising registered patent agents, trademark attorneys, and IP specialists at Intepat IP, Bangalore. The team handles patent and trademark prosecution, design protection, and global IP advisory.

Ready to Secure Your IP?

Join 2,000+ businesses that trust Intepat for their global IP strategies.

Get Started TodayExplore Our Services
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest insights on intellectual property, patents, and trademarks delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Intepat IP

Patent & Trademark Attorneys in Bangalore, serving clients across India and worldwide.

LinkedInYouTube

Patent Services

  • Patentability Search
  • Freedom to Operate Search
  • Patent Invalidity Search
  • Patent Landscape Analysis
  • Patent Drafting
  • File a Patent in India
  • PCT International Application
  • PCT National Phase Entry
  • File a Patent Abroad
  • Patent Prosecution
  • Patent Renewals
  • Software and AI Patents
  • Engineering Patents
  • Patent Portfolio Audit
  • Patent Due Diligence

Trademark Services

  • Trademark Search & Clearance
  • Trademark Watch
  • Register in India
  • TM Prosecution & Maintenance
  • Trademark Renewal
  • Madrid Protocol Filing
  • Provisional Refusal Response
  • File a Trademark in the USA
  • File a Trademark in the UK
  • File a Trademark in the EU
  • File a Trademark in the UAE
  • Trademark Portfolio Audit
  • Trademark Enforcement

Design & Copyright

  • Design Registration in India
  • File a Design Abroad
  • Design Cancellation & Enforcement
  • Copyright Registration
  • Software Copyright Registration
  • Copyright Assignment & Licensing
  • Copyright Enforcement & Takedowns

Cross-IP & Strategy

  • Global IP Filing
  • IP Audit & Strategy
  • IP Due Diligence
  • IP Licensing & Agreements
  • IP for Startups

Our Office

Bangalore

AddressNo:8, 1st Floor, 15th Cross, 100 Feet Ring Road, JP Nagar 6th Phase, Bangalore – 560078, IndiaEmailcontact@intepat.comPhone+91-80-42173649
HoursMon – Fri, 09:30 AM – 6:30 PM
TermsPrivacyRefundIP ServicesContact
© Copyright 2026 - Intepat.com